DGR wrote the Italian sonnet first: he sent a copy in his letter to WMR on 7 November 1872, a few days after he finished negotiating with Charles Augustus Howell about the purchase of the oil of Proserpine that he was working on at that time.

A corrected copy of the Italian text is at Princeton and a fair copy is in the Boston Public Library. A fair copy of the Italian text is in the British Library. DGR's prose ekphrasis survives in the library at Duke University. DGR also sent a fair copy of both the Italian and the English sonnets, along with a prose ekphrasis, in his letter to Stephens of ca. 10 August 1875 and Stephens used these texts and commentaries for the essay on DGR's paintings that he published several days later in (see his , , 219-221 ).

Another manuscript copy is extant and was sold at a Sotheby's auction on 15 July 1998 (lot 353). It was sent in an undated letter to Ford Madox Brown. It is presently untraced but was said to have “one autograph correction”.

DGR seems to have begun work on the subject in 1871 since the date of the pastel at the Ashmolean bears that date. He started serious work on the picture late in 1872 when he came to an agreement with Howell and Parsons (the painter and photographer who also worked as an art dealer) to buy the picture for 550 guineas (see DGR's letter to Howell of 1 November 1872, Fredeman, Correspondence, 72. 105 ). In this letter he comments: “I enclose extract from Lemprière copied by Dunn. You see the passage about the pomegranate. I may possibly write a sonnet and introduce it in one corner of the picture if suiting composition.” Two days later he wrote to his brother that “The Proserpine I am selling him is a second one I have begun. The first did not quite please me, but will sell as a separate thing by cutting out the head which is done. The second is very well started, and I fully expect to finish it soon and beg the tin” ( Fredeman , Correspondence, 72. 106 ). It seems this second picture was also deemed unsatisfactory by the artist, as was the third, which became the oil. The letter hints toward the multipying and sometimes catastrophic fortunes of what DGR called “this doomed picture” in a letter to Madox Brown of 6 January 1874, when he reported that the version he had done for Leyland (the now so-called seventh version) was smashed in railway transit. He went on to tell Brown about “the vicissitudes of this blessed picture”: “I have begun it on seven different canvases— to say nothing of drawings. Three were rejected after being brought very forward. The fourth cost me a quarrel with Parsons, & will be returned on my hands. The fifth has twice had its glass smashed & renewed, & has twice been lined to remedy accidents. The sixth has had its frame smashed twice & its glass once, was nearly rendered useless by an accident which happened while transferring it to a fresh strainer, & now has narrowly escaped total destruction” ( Fredeman , Correspondence, 74.4 ) An eighth version would come later, begun in 1881 and finished shortly before DGR's death.

In 1878 DGR gave a long description of the symbolic context of the picture to W. A. Turner, who had just bought the (so-called) sixth version: “The figure represents Proserpine as Empress of Hades. After she was conveyed by Pluto to his realm, and became his bride, her mother Ceres importuned Jupiter for her return to earth, and he was prevailed on to consent to this, provided only she had not partaken any of the fruits of Hades. It was found, however, that she had eaten one grain of a pomegranate, and this enchained her to her new empire and destiny. She is represented in a gloomy corridor of her palace, with the fatal fruit in her hand. As she passes, a gleam strikes on the wall behind her from some inlet suddenly opened, and admitting for a moment the light of the upper world; and she glances furtively toward it, immersed in thought. The incense-burner stands behind her as the attribute of a goddess. The ivy-branch in the background (a decorative appendage to the sonnet inscribed on the label) may be taken as a symbol of clinging memory” (see Sharp, , 236 ).

The sonnets were first published together, along with the English/Italian pair of sonnets, in under the heading “Sonnets for Pictures” (28 August 1875). DGR then republished them with slight variations in the 1881 Ballads and Sonnets and they were collected thereafter.

It has long been observed that (in Virginia Surtees' words) “the subject of Proserpine bound to her husband except for a few short periods of escape, would seem to bear an analogy to their own two lives [i.e., Jane Morris and DGR]” (see Surtees, , vol. 1. 131).

Agosta, 86-89 Marillier, , 169-170 WMR, , 80-81 Sharp, , 234-237 Stephens, , 78-81. Surtees, vol. 1, 131-134 (no. 233). , [Tate 1997] 159-160. Wildman, , 316-317.