The only surviving text is the fair copy copied into the Notebook designated II by Paull Baum when he made an analytical survey the the Duke University DGR manuscripts. The early manuscript of is among the manuscripts gathered under the same notebook heading. But analysis of the paper shows that Baum's Notebook II comprises materials taken from separate (similar) notebooks.

WMR dates the poem 1847 and says that it was included among the works gathered into the family magazine which was produced in 1846-47. It was sometimes called by the titles and (see Fredeman, The P.R.B. Journal , 55 : WMR's diary entry for 16 February 1850).

A manuscript fragment also exists that seems clearly to have been intended for the poem. No version of the poem survives that includes this fragment.

Strictly speaking this poem was never revised, though it was used by DGR in 1869 as a basis text for the composition of , which has the same prosodic form and a few identical lines.

First printed, privately, in the Rossetti family magazine in 1847, according to WMR. After that it remained unpublished until the manuscript was printed in Baum's Manuscripts in the Duke University Library in 1931. WMR printed a stanza from the manuscript in the notes to the 1911 text of .

Although the poem does not connect to any specific pictures, it is clearly a work that takes up the relation of poetry and painting. The matter is explicitly drawn into the theme in stanza 5, but it pervades the entire poem.

The pictorial/literary issues are also a central part of , which would have incorporated this work, as well as of , which is the fulfilled companion work of the uncompleted story.

The work is a conscious act of homage to Browning's work with the dramatic monologue — indeed, it seems to be DGR's first serious effort to imitate the form. The allusions to Browning's in stanzas 1-2 are clear and clearly deliberate. DGR seems also to have had in mind Poe's story .

The work should also be compared with the 1869 poem, , which DGR drew out of this early piece, as well as with the two early prose pieces (of 1850 and 1849) that deal with the same kinds of literary/artistic issues ( and ). sonnet titled is another related text, as is , which was composed about the same time. The connection to the latter is clearest in a passage like stanza 12.

WMR ( 1911 662 ) has a note to arguing against the autobiographical character of that poem. The argument is closely tied to what WMR saw as the original version of the 1869 poem, that is, the present early work. As Baum notes, is distinctly autobiographical in character ( Baum, 28-29 ), and indeed distinguishes itself from the earlier poem on this very ground. The matter is interesting and important because it shows—what we often see in DGR's work—how he could (and did) refashion early work to later purposes and circumstances.

Works (1911), WMR's note on pp. 662-63. WMR, DGR as Designer and Writer , 126. Baum, Manuscripts in the Duke University Library, 26-33, 67-71. Swafford, , 78-91 .