On July 26, 1880, Rossetti wrote to William Bell Scott, to whom he had sent a copy of the “White Ship” not long before, indicating that he now planned to write “something in the same vein. The Death of James the First of Scotland, told by Catherine Douglas, will be my next essay.” But Rossetti does not appear to have made much progress on this project until later that winter. Eager to finish the ballad in order to fill out the length of his planned new edition of poems, Rossetti wrote to Jane Morris on December 17, “I must get one long ballad done—that on the death of James of Scotland.” By February, Rossetti was at work on the ballad, with the help of the Maitland edition of the . WMR records in his diary that DGR took up the work in earnest around 16 February 1881 and that the work was half finished a week later. The ballad was finished on 3 March (see Fredeman, , 80. 260, 386 and 81. 79, 99 ).

DGR's draft manuscript is in the Fitzwilliam Museum Library; his fair printer's copy with various additions and corrections is in the Huntington. The draft manuscript is an especially interesting document since it carries materials—for instance, elaborate prose summaries of the ballad's key poetic events—that throw into sharp relief DGR's compositional methods for poems of this kind.

Early fragments of the poem appear in Note Book II (lines 165-170) and Note Book IV (lines 1-17 and lines 149-152, 568-572) in the British Library. Note Book III in the Duke University library also has a copy of lines 165-170, 149-152, and 1-17.

DGR originally intended to title the poem “Kate Barlass”, after his chosen narrator. In a mid-March 1881 exchange of letters he discussed with his brother various possible titles such as “Catherine Douglas,” “Catherine's Record,” “Queen Jane's Poet,” and “The Queen's Poet-King”. He settled on “” in late March.

To this day opinions about the quality of the poem differ greatly, though certain passages—for instance, those treating the prophecy of the old woman—have always been admired. The most frequent charge against the ballad, diffuseness, no doubt emerges because of the economy that is such a signal feature of DGR's ballads. The slow-motion narratives of and do not submit to such a charge because neither are built around a realist narrative structure.

First published in the 1881 and collected thereafter.

Born in 1394, James I became heir to the throne of Scotland after the murder of his older brother at the hands of a rival political faction. Fearing that James might suffer the same fate, his father, Robert III, attempted to send the prince to France in secret. But James was intercepted by the army of Henry Bolingbroke (Henry IV), which spirited him off to England where he remained in captivity (alternating between stints at court, in the Tower, and in military service) until 1424. While he was thus immured, James wrote , which speaks of his love for Joan Beaufort, whom he married shortly before his return to Scotland. After James's return to Scotland, he attempted to implement a number of sweeping reforms that served to strengthen his own central authority through the often violent suppression of an unruly and rebellious feudal nobility. The strong opposition to these efforts eventually led to James's murder by rebel lords in late February 1437, six months after the failed campaign at Roxburgh.

DGR's main sources for his ballad include George Gilfillan's , the , and Sir Walter Scott's (1828: first series). However, his most important source was a fifteenth century prose chronicle , translated by John Shirley around 1440. Ellis provided DGR with an edition of this work, published by the Maitland Club in 1837 as . It became the source of episodes such as James's conversation with the King of Love and Robert Grĉme's defiant outburst at the meeting of parliament. DGR's use of this chronicle also offers a glimpse at his methods of working with his sources: “It would show him omitting freely whatever he found dull, but always expanding and expanding, even to the very skirts of dullness, whatever he decided to use” (Culler, 437). The most striking of these augmentations is Rossetti's transformation of the chronicle's brief reference to “a woman of Yreland, that clepid herselfe a suthesayer” who warns the king “ye pase this water, ye shall never turne ayane on lyve“ (quoted in Culler, 435). into one of the most dramatic and haunting moments in his ballad (see lines 165ff.).

Elsewhere DGR abbreviates significant plot details while expanding the story's psychological dimensions and their consequences. Whereas the chronicle offers extensive and gruesome details of the regicides's tortures and executions, DGR compresses his own version of the brutal events into one splendidly wicked line spoken in a whisper by Queen Jane (line 809).

DGR infuses the ballad with the Christological mythos. The king presides at a kind of Last Supper with Robert Stuart as Judas and the Voidee-cup as Christ's chalice. It perhaps hardly needs remark that DGR's treatment is radically secularized.

As we see from the early fragment (lines 165-170) in the small Note Book II (British Library, the material was originally associated in his mind with his project.

That the ballad had strong personal meanings for DGR is certain. DGR's inclination to identify with James I may have begun in 1868 and 1869, when he stayed and wrote at Penkill Castle, where the main spiral staircase contained frescoes depicting scenes from James I's poem. One can hardly fail to see the personal relation of lines 26-43 to DGR's own life: see especially . In addition, the whole treatment of the relation between the King and the Queen recalls DGR's way of thinking about Jane Morris, epitomized in the late (uncompleted) project of .

Culler, (1944), 427-441 Fredeman ed., (1982), 217-245 Keane, , 179-193